Micro Interactions + Direct Engagement
So here's a presentation I gave recently to a client. I'm thinking through the concepts of "Micro Interactions" and "Direct Engagement". The slideshow (download PDF) includes both previous and new thoughts and was inspired by a quote I wrote for Inspire UX:
“We live in a world where the little things really do matter. Each encounter no matter how brief is a micro interaction which makes a deposit or withdrawal from our rational and emotional subconscious. The sum of these interactions and encounters adds up to how we feel about a particular product, brand or service. Little things. Feelings. They influence our everyday behaviors more than we realize.”
Feedback welcome!




You have a real knack for these SlideShare presentations. Now we need to hear you give them! :)
Posted by: Cam Beck | Tuesday, April 29, 2008 at 09:49 PM
Thanks for another great overview of the changing media landscape. I always feel empowered and inspired after reading your posts. Trying to act on these ideas at the architecture/design level, I have noticed that even interactive industry types are - sometimes quite unconsciously - stuck in the old broadcast mindset. Whether it's number of eyeballs or time on site http://jasonsack.com/?p=6 , people still tend to look at the new in terms of the old. It's good to zoom out.
Posted by: Jason Sack | Wednesday, April 30, 2008 at 08:39 AM
FYI, I watched your Blog Eye View post and wrote it up the other day. Link here:
http://timbauer.bauerfive.com/2008/04/30/david-armano-enabling-doctors-to-be-patients/
I would agree you should put up more of your full length speaking. Would be curious to hear how your thoughts beyond how your blog rose to the size it is now.
Posted by: Tim Bauer | Wednesday, April 30, 2008 at 12:54 PM
I actually like Jason's reference to microtasks, but he misses the potential. 2.0 (shortening the distance) is ALL about micro. Because influences are all micro.
David: I'm really interested in the whole Starbucks thing. There's some deeper investigative reporting (or 'speaking' if there's anyone from Starbucks who can add some 'inside' light) needed here. The stock chart really adds a great dimension to the reality check going on within a LOT of companies right now.
The economics are now in our favor. [And yet I'm still dealing with stupid conversations around "just give me dancing hammers"]
Posted by: Paula Thornton | Wednesday, April 30, 2008 at 12:55 PM
Very inspirational post! I think the educational world could learn a few things about the emergence of Web 2.0 as a tool in the schools and with their own websites. Thank you for sharing your slide show!
Posted by: Lisa Raines | Wednesday, April 30, 2008 at 02:11 PM
A real cool and great presentation. The slide 22 of the 3U's is now a day a reality.
Posted by: Nicolás | Wednesday, April 30, 2008 at 02:58 PM
Whew! Fascinating. Thanks for sharing with us. I've embedded the slide show on one of my sites at http://sclohonet.blogspot.com/2008/04/re-defining-branding.html
Posted by: ScLoHo (Scott Howard) | Wednesday, April 30, 2008 at 03:20 PM
Feelings . . . hmmm. Sounds familiar. :)
Posted by: Tom Asacker | Wednesday, April 30, 2008 at 05:36 PM
Your "from --> to" list is a great checklist for a 2.0 audit or as stimuli for ideation. Thanks!
Posted by: Leah | Thursday, May 01, 2008 at 09:01 AM
David, a great presentation and I really like your insights into micro interactions. Consider adding the impact of these micro-interactions on new product development to create the loyalty effect. Becuase companies like Nike, Starbucks, Dell and others can use this direct consumer engagement to unlock the latest social trends and tastes -finding new segments for new/existing products.
Posted by: Michael West | Thursday, May 01, 2008 at 04:48 PM
Super well done.
Posted by: olivier blanchard | Friday, May 02, 2008 at 12:00 AM
Interesting and nice presentation!
It's remember: "Communities Dominate Brands"
Thank you for share
Bye from Brazil
Posted by: Dani Porto | Friday, May 02, 2008 at 08:55 AM
Micro interactions are just a subset or extension of an end cap. Essentially, we are creating smaller, quicker conversations to consumers, like an endcap. Great slide show though, summing up the myriad changes that are occurring in technology, media, communications and marketing.
Posted by: Marc Meyer | Friday, May 02, 2008 at 12:27 PM
The use of slideshare to offer this document to the public is a demonstration of slides 31 and 32. Very cool tool and I think it's great you're integrating L+E into a client presentation.
Posted by: Len Kendall | Friday, May 02, 2008 at 01:10 PM
awesome post
Posted by: bloggersmosaic | Friday, May 02, 2008 at 11:00 PM
One of the owners at EffectiveUI talked to our creative team last week about his experience leading sound teams at Warner Bros. in Hollywood. He talked about the foodchain in film. Everyone aspires to climb from day-time TV, to prime-time, to B-Movies, and then to blockbusters. Again, sound quality in film came down to how much time could be spent finessing the very small details. These micro improvements enhance the experience at an almost subliminal level for the viewers. They are almost transparent unless you are in the industry, but contribute to the whole experience in ways that are hard to imagine.
With a large enough budget, amazing things can happen. And when amazing things happen (think ILM), larger budgets and more time are easier to come by.
So I think a lot of this is about education. Convincing companies to spend more money to be able to do the iterations necessary for really nailing applications is a most noble pursuit in our line of work. It's the chicken and the egg metaphor of procuring a budget that allows for exceptional design so that enough credibility will be gained that asking for bigger budget is possible.
Your presentation is great. The sweet spot of great user experience is definitely at the micro level. Now lets just convince the rest of the world!
Posted by: John McRee | Sunday, May 04, 2008 at 10:41 AM
It's hard to comment without your actually commentary, but it looks like the talk is going to be great! One thing, visually, on a lot of the slides that you have full webpages, they're very busy, so even though you're probably going to talk to one or two aspects, the audience might be scanning the whole website and not listening (at least that's what they tell you in b-school :-) ha!). Don't know if you can crop the juicy parts.
Also, for your own pleasure, or to add to the presentation, not sure if you've seen Lowes Sunnyville campaign (http://lowes.com/lowes/lkn?action=pg&p=Promos/spring/index.html&ln=cstln1#, click on "Launch Sunnyville). I bring it up because I went to a talk by the Founder of the design firm that put it together and they said they get so many page hits (with all the good stuff like multiple page views and long viewing time etc etc), more than they were expecting (or what you might think if you went to the site).... I thought of it on multiple slides, but specifically #25. Don't know if it would be a good addition.
Posted by: Kate | Sunday, May 04, 2008 at 04:35 PM
David... thanks for sharing. Aligns very much with my thinking and strategy in developing a better customer experience @ SAP.
Thanx again,
Steve
Posted by: Steve Mann | Sunday, May 04, 2008 at 08:51 PM