GREATEST HITS
User Experience Building Blocks
Never Forget Where You Come From
Got Juice? (Podcast with Jaffe)
Human Hierarchy + Collaboration
HP is blogging. Why aren't YOU?
Visualizing Social Media Network
Interaction Design Made Simple
In Around, Outside The Sandbox
Holy Trinity of Experience Design
« High vs. Low Design | Main | People, Places + Events »
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341bfa9853ef00e552b83be68834
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Stairway to Brand Heaven & Hell:
» The Steps to Brand Greatness (or Brand Purgatory) from Intersection Small Business Marketing Blog
By Mark Smiciklas [Read More]
» Innovation Notes: June 4, 2008 from Jason Haley
[Read More]
» Brand Heaven & Hell from //steve clayton: geek in disguise
Armano nails is again. He just does the best graphics for the world of social media. Still bummed I missed [Read More]
» Stairway to Brand Heaven from Strategy Central
One of the blogs I check out regularly is Logic Emotion. Often a really good way of looking at things, maybe a little unexpected, but definitely will make you think. Check out this diagram about the Stairway to Brand [Read More]
» Stairway to haven and/or hell from Architects Rule!
http://darmano.typepad.com/logic_emotion/2008/06/brand-stairway.html [Read More]
You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.
This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.
As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.
Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.
Speaking At:
Conversational Marketing Summit
SXSW 09
Marketing 2.0, Paris
WOMMA 2008
Forrester Consumer Forum 08
IDEA 2008
O'Reilly Web 2.0 Expo
Chicago New Media Summit
The Conference Board
Ad Age Digital Marketing
MIX 08
Interaction 08
UI 12
CanUX
In The News
Adweek Spotlight
Conversation Economy
Conversation Architects
IN Blogs
Best of 2006
Overnight Success
A Blog's Eye View
Video Clips
MIX 08
Interaction 08
Forrester 2007 Forum
Chicago Office
Road To Dell
Chat with Ze Frank
Blog's Eye View
CM Links
Experience Matters
Always in Beta
Beta Reel
12 Consumer Values for Your Wall
Navigators, Explorers, and Engaged Participant
Top 10 Things You Can Do During A “Blogoutâ€
Rocketbust: It’s About Talent
Is Creativity the New Innovation?
It's All About the Custoconsumuser
But What About the Touchpoints?
First Impressions, Blogs, and Your Personal Brand
Need Inspiration? Get Out of Your Sandbox
Confessions of a Dot-com Survivor
We Need More T-Shaped Creativity
Delight = Brand + Experience
Interesting - I'd suggest perhaps though that a brand's behaviour would need to be consistent before it gained my trust. Thoughts?
Posted by: David Gillespie | Tuesday, June 03, 2008 at 06:12 PM
David,
Thanks for that feedback. You're right, trust is a result of all the previous steps. I've updated the visual.
Posted by: David Armano | Tuesday, June 03, 2008 at 09:43 PM
Great image! Can I have permission to put it in a post at my blog. It will underscore a point I am trying to make about American Airlines. I will give you full credit and a link to your blog.
Posted by: chronicler | Tuesday, June 03, 2008 at 09:57 PM
Hi David,
1) LOVE the image. Really, really like it. Fun, envigorating.
2) I wonder about speaking to other people about the brand. Specifically, if you think about Kathy Sierra's "Creating Passionate Users," I think on the up-side above loyalty, you have "passion." Also, below the positive interaction and above the negative interaction, I wonder if there isn't the hearing-about-the-brand red-Beetle effect (you know, when someone mentions a red Beetle, all you start to see on the roads are red Beetles).
Best!
Senia
Posted by: Senia Maymin | Tuesday, June 03, 2008 at 11:19 PM
Thanks
But shouldn't consistency be spelt with an e?
Posted by: Nishad | Wednesday, June 04, 2008 at 12:00 AM
@chronicler go ahead, credit it appreciated.
@nishad, it's been corrected. I think the image you are seeing might be cashed. Thanks.
Posted by: David Armano | Wednesday, June 04, 2008 at 12:17 AM
Great visual. It makes important points in a fun and easy way.
Keep Digging For Worms!
Posted by: Bill (Dr. William J. Ward) a.k.a. DR4WARD | Wednesday, June 04, 2008 at 03:45 AM
I just love the heck out of this. Brilliant.
Is there a "faith" category as well, as in having faith that a brand will always do right by you.
Bruce
Posted by: bruce nussbaum | Wednesday, June 04, 2008 at 08:45 AM
Love this graph David.
How exactly would you describe positive interaction Vs negative?
Is positive about having a dialogue opened to criticism that the brand responds to?
Posted by: Michele Bouquet | Wednesday, June 04, 2008 at 09:59 AM
This resonates. My current company gets it and really walks the talk. My previous company - a leading national childcare provider, did not. In so many conversations I had with both customers and employees, the steps unfortunately went down versus up.
Posted by: patrick prothe | Wednesday, June 04, 2008 at 10:43 AM
Great visual.
Would you consider adding "Value (uniquely meets a need)" as the first tier? It's a key differentiator (which raises the question of incorporating timeline - brand awareness, brand selection, brand interaction, brand evolution, etc.).
Posted by: Peter West | Wednesday, June 04, 2008 at 11:10 AM
Another awesome diagram.
A great conversation piece too;
>Are the steps linear?
>Can you go up as quick as you go down?#
>Does loyalty apply to someone selling engagement rings?
>Is the point where you are not in Heaven or Hell the most popular spot on the stairway.
Great stuff
Posted by: Chris Hoskin | Wednesday, June 04, 2008 at 11:16 AM
Beyond loyalty, there is surely evangelism, as any Mac-head will attest...
Posted by: Pete Mortensen | Wednesday, June 04, 2008 at 11:56 AM
LOVE this. A lot.
Posted by: Bob LeDrew | Wednesday, June 04, 2008 at 02:43 PM
lame
Posted by: wow! | Wednesday, June 04, 2008 at 08:01 PM
What's the difference between disloyalty and loyalty?
Better yet, is disloyalty simply "not loyal" or is, perhaps, instead it's more of an aversion type of thing?
I think that disloyalty means that something kind of becomes a commodity and people will "shop anywhere" for their fix. That's bad, but you still may be able to get some action in that mix. Aversion, on the other hand, is kind of like spitting when you say the name.
So I wonder which is it that you have at that bottom-most step.
Likewise, once you get to the top step, there is probably evangelistic, right? Being loyal is fantastic, but if brands can get someone to be evangelistic, then that would be heaven, since, again, that word of mouth thing, is something you can't get by throwing money at people.
And, of course, the best possibly way to get back up the stairs once you've traversed too far down is through positive word of mouth, I suspect.
Posted by: Russ Unger | Wednesday, June 04, 2008 at 08:13 PM
Nice image David! I think your graphic illustrations should start coming with sound clips as well. Nicely done.
I also agree with what has been stated above. A loyal customer will help spread the word about a brand they are fond of. Likewise, the disloyal customer will spread the opposite.
Posted by: Eric Reagan | Wednesday, June 04, 2008 at 09:45 PM
That's great !
It makes me think about "le jeux de l'Oie" as we say in French...
Yet better, that game where to get to "heaven" you have obstacles (your consistency, credibility, etc...), but in that game should you miss a point your are sent back few steps through "toboggan/slides"... Which would mean direct link between upper and lower stairs... upon some particular "mistakes"... but I agree, the image might become more complicated...
:)
Posted by: MaX | Thursday, June 05, 2008 at 12:38 AM
I question loyalty as the top tier of attainment after 8 years of it in DC.
Posted by: Mary Anne Davis | Thursday, June 05, 2008 at 01:39 PM
David:
Nice graphic. If only I could convince people that building a brand community (or doing viral marketing) wasn't the shortcut to loyalty!
TO'B
Posted by: Tom O'Brien | Thursday, June 05, 2008 at 03:41 PM
wow how amazing through design you can articulate a message that companies continue to screw up, maybe this will get them thinking
Posted by: Pinny | Thursday, June 05, 2008 at 04:04 PM
David, how 'bout making your diagram a board game. The design makes it ideal for folding in half. Roll the dice, and players could pick up cards that say things like "customer walked and store and was ignored, move back 2 spaces," or "you delivered your ____ the day you said it would be delivered," move up 2 spaces. Would make a great holiday gift for agency clients.
best,
bonnie
Richmond, VA
USA
Posted by: Bonnie Larner | Thursday, June 05, 2008 at 07:37 PM
Great imagery! Being truthful (or not) in your branding and messages has a real impact these days, we all know you can't hide from your end customers any longer, but I've not seen it put into such a good image before.
Thanks
Harry Bishop
http://www.harrybishop.ca
Posted by: Harry Bishop | Friday, June 06, 2008 at 11:52 AM
I love this image. Perfect example of great "impact-per-inch" executed creatively.
I'm going to have to link to this in a future post.
Cheers,
Patrick Byers
The Responsible Marketing Blog
http://responsiblemarketing.com
Posted by: Patrick Byers | Saturday, June 07, 2008 at 01:52 AM
Once again you have nailed it!
A new way to look at "brand hell."
Posted by: David Tokheim | Saturday, June 07, 2008 at 11:24 AM
This is a great visual for not just branding but also what happens inside companies between employees, managers and social interactions with vendors. It is a shame when great leaders start going down the staircase. People are so perceptive-and the leadership team is on stage everyday. This is a great reminder for us all and what can happen to our personal brands.
Posted by: Rebecca | Saturday, June 07, 2008 at 07:42 PM
Nice chart, but sort of disheartening that it's being seen by so many as "news."
You'd think something like this would be so obvious as to constitute Marketing 101.
Yet the actions of so many companies tell us that clearly it's not and that it's a message that's worth repeating.
Maybe the clarity of your graphics will help bring it home this time.
Posted by: Alan Wolk (The Toad Stool) | Sunday, June 08, 2008 at 12:53 PM
There are six steps to brand heaven, but only five to brand hell. Where do you address not being credible in the road to brand hell?
Posted by: P31dionne | Monday, June 09, 2008 at 08:38 AM
I agree with the passion or evangelist as brand nirvana, but I think there should be an equal opposite pit of despair for the consumer who detests and takes action to hurt your brand.
Posted by: P31dionne | Monday, June 09, 2008 at 12:06 PM
That's cool, that's simple and makes a lot of sense.
I'd consider only to make stairways to hell MOVING STARS - it's easy to go down, but going back is tough as hell.
rgds
Posted by: bzal | Wednesday, June 11, 2008 at 04:10 AM
David,
Why should heaven stop at just personal loyalty, dont you think Brand Advocacy would be the next logical higher step and similarly at Hell Brand Tarnishing will be a higher (Lower?) level. Do you agree?
Posted by: Pritam | Tuesday, June 17, 2008 at 12:34 AM
Hey David:
Love the graphic! Simple visuals like this are a great teaching tool for new employees, clients, etc. Thanks for putting this together.
With your permission, I'd like to blog about "Brand Heaven & Hell" at CelticSuite206.com. I'll give you full credit and link to your blog. Please let me know if you're OK with this.
Thanks again!
Brian
Posted by: Brian | Wednesday, June 18, 2008 at 09:22 AM
This is awesome.
Can I translate this graph into Japanese ,post this graph on my blog ,also put your credit and link.
Thanks
Posted by: shoe-g | Thursday, June 26, 2008 at 11:05 PM
Great! May I translate it into swedish and post the image on our blog together with credit and link?
Posted by: Lena | Sunday, July 06, 2008 at 03:45 PM
May I use this image (credited to you) in a training session at our ad agency? Also, I like the game idea, so can I create one that uses your image and all the legs that it provides? It would go great with the training session. Please let me know. Thanks!
Posted by: P31dionne | Monday, July 07, 2008 at 07:07 PM
Wonder if this dude ever read the Bible? it would appear not cause he is WAY off.
JT
www.FireMe.To/udi
Posted by: Justin Frolic | Monday, July 14, 2008 at 07:49 PM
I never comment on sites I happen upon during research sessions, but this link was too good to pass up.
GREAT image. I got a "too-true" chuckle out of it.
Now please excuse me while I go try to avoid some hell ...
Posted by: Andrea | Tuesday, July 22, 2008 at 11:37 AM
Really nice graphic David but I feel like something is still missing from the real world: where should we place the complete absence of interaction?
Someone probably think it should be placed right in the center of the diagram but maybe when we talk about "brand experience" a lack of communication, expecially online, is pretty similar to a negative interaction as it causes negative feelings. What do you think about?
Posted by: Daniela Trifone | Tuesday, August 05, 2008 at 04:49 PM
Hi David
I am a Human Resource Manager within my organisation, I loved the graphic and it made a huge impact.
However,wihtin our organisation we have people who are Atheists, and I feel that this graphic would not have impact on them.
How would you change this graphic to overcome ethical implication?
Posted by: Gina | Saturday, August 23, 2008 at 08:41 AM
David,
I really enjoyed this visual and referenced it in a blog post on my site. .... I'm fairly new to blogging and a friend mentioned that you might not be cool with having other people show the image on their blogs. If so, I'm happy to remove the image and just have a link to your site.
Thanks for considering this request.
Best.
Roland
Posted by: Roland Smart | Monday, January 19, 2009 at 06:06 PM